Social Complexity and Agility

1st International Workshop on Complexity and Real-World Applications, Day 1

Yesterday was the first day of the 1st International Workshop on Complexity and Real-World Applications , an invitation-only event held in Southampton. Set in a scenic venue, the conference was organised in a loveably sloppy way by Andrew Tait and Kurt Richardson. The two of them are doing an admirable job, but the scenic venue is tending to be the biggest problem. As a hotel that probably caters mainly to weddings on weekends, it is woefully inadequate as a conference venue. You can follow the conference on Twitter (hashtag #cxapps), but the bad internet connectivity means that the back-channel communication I’m accustomed to from geek conferences isn’t happening. Also, being stuffed in a room with tables arranged in a U-form introduced an environment that was more conducive to presenting than to discussing, but at least we could break out into other parts of the scenic venue for conversations – and we did that a lot.

The workshop started with Kurt explaining the motivation behind organising it, after which followed the round of what Mark McKergow called “creeping-death” introductions. Although I also dislike such introduction rounds, it was fascinating to hear what diversity and depth of experience the attendees brought with them, and it was comforting to hear that they understood the same thing that I do for terms such as complexity and self-organisation.

After the introductions, we enjoyed the first part of a talk by George Rzevski, professor emeritus for complexity science at the Open University. I won’t go into the talk in detail; the slides are available on the workshop website. One slide, though, was very thought- and discussion-provoking. There is still no generally agreed-on definition of complexity, and dozens of attempts exist. George presented his 7 criteria for complexity, which we found that (although there were differing points of view that could be discussed) seemed to all of us to be ok, good enough, a good first step towards a common definition.

George Rzevski’s Seven Criteria for Complexity

  1. INTERACTION – A complex system consists of a large number of diverse components (Agents) engaged in rich interaction
  2. AUTONOMY – Agents are largely autonomous but subject to certain laws, rules or norms; there is no central control but agent behaviour is not random
  3. EMERGENCE – Global behaviour of a complex system “emerges” from the interaction of agents and is therefore unpredictable
  4. FAR FROM EQUILIBRIUM – Complex systems are “far from equilibrium” because frequent occurrences of disruptive events do not allow the system to return to the equilibrium
  5. NONLINEARITY – Nonlinearity occasionally causes an insignificant input to be amplified into an extreme event (butterfly effect)
  6. SELF-ORGANISATION – Complex systems are capable of self-organisation in response to disruptive events
  7. CO-EVOLUTION – Complex systems irreversibly co-evolve with their environments

After lunch, we held an extended poster session. Having never done a poster session before, I simply drew one using visualisation techniques (thanks to Martin Haussmann for teaching me!), and was surpised at the positive responses I got. My topic is the bi-directional insights of using the Cynefin method to understand why Agile works, and using Scrum as a framework for managing work in the complex domain. I’ll be presenting my paper on this later this morning, and am looking forward to the feedback and discussions that will come. During the poster session, I also had interesting talks with Mark McKergow on solution-focused therapy and complexity, and with Ed Olson on his CDE model and the Cynefin ABIDE model, which I use quite heavily in my work on self-organising teams.

When the poster session was done, there was still some time until the evening barbeque, and George Rzevski presented the second part of his talk. He’s done fascinating and world-class work, I highly recommend checking out his slides.

Dinner, drinks and conversation followed, and by the time I got to bed, I was suffering from information overload, and was too tired to write this blog post, which is why I’m doing it now.

More later.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

simplicities comprar viagra generico en españa clinic
wood buy viagra online Monday 30th October 2013. Dental Nurse Course Tutors. Matters discussed were the NEBDN Records of Experience which are about to become available online and the NEBDN Online Witness Training Programme which has just gone live. Friday 11th October 2013. Friday 18th - Saturday 19th October. Joan Hatchard and Sophie Schneider attended the annual British Association of Dental Nurses Conference held in the NEC Birmingham. Cresswell KM, Bates DW, Sheikh A. Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technology. Nurmatov UB, Tagiyeva N, Semple S, Devereux G, Sheikh A. Volatile Organic Compounds and risk of asthma and allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and interventional studies. This research presently focuses on muscle tissue and stendra online in future, will be expanded to include other solid organs, applying the principles and knowledge gained from muscle as a solid organ. MEDICAL EDUCATION: In the area of medical education, Nalini is particularly interested in student learning and assessment in the medical sciences. She is currently developing Adaptive eLearning tutorials in Anatomy to be used as a formative assessment tool. Adaptive eLearning tutorials provide a platform for formative assessment of students providing immediate feedback and opportunity to remediate gaps in knowledge. At an educator level, it has the potential to identify areas of troublesome knowledge for a cohort of students, and to evaluate student learning..