Social Complexity and Agility

log(N) = 0.093 + 3.389 log(CR) (1) (r2=0.764, t34=10.35, p<0.001), or 147.8 friends

What’s that wierd formula in the title? It’s the best-fit reduced major axis regression equation between neocortex ratio and mean group size for the sample of 36 primate genera taken from Robin Dunbar’s 1992 paper, and which is normally interpreted as being a natural limit on human group size of 150 (or 147.8 to be exact). I learned about Dunbar’s number, as it’s called, during a course I did with Dave Snowden, who also blogged about it here. Both Dunbar’s paper, and Snowden’s blog, make for fascinating reading, especially for the people I know who question what optimum team size is, and what the biggest possible project is that you can coordinate successfully. But why am I blogging about it here? That answer’s quite simple.

I’ve started using Facebook.

I had kept myself happily free of all the Web 2.0 pseudo-social networking sites up until now, but chose to sign up for Facebook to get in contact with some old friends I couldn’t reach otherwise. Even so, I didn’t want to spend more time and energy there than was absolutely necessary to maintain these important social contacts. I had heard various horror stories about Facebook. My father told me, “what monster have I created? It just keeps sucking me in deeper and deeper.” My dear friend Evelyn told me that she got quite a lot of friendship invitations from unknown men simply because, as some of them wrote: “your profile picture’s so hot”. (n.b. she’s since changed it to one of her dog).

Every time you go to your home page in Facebook, it tells you how many “friends” you have. Are these really friends? Maybe some of them are, but many (if not most) are people who’ve become connected to you simply because of the social network construction mechanism available within Facebook makes it so easy, and because of the competitive aspect: “I’ve got more friends than you”. (Thought: could a lack of virtual friends lead to a virtual depression?)

Having all these contacts as friends, though, is an expensive proposition. The cost of maintaining social ties can be considerable. In one of his blog posts, Christopher Allen (quoting Dunbar) points out the consequences that a social network of 150 would have:

The group size predicted for modern humans by equation (1) would require as much as 42% of the total time budget to be devoted to social grooming.

42% is a lot of time! No wonder many companies block people’s access to such sites at work. In an interesting corollary, Dunbar wrote the following:

My suggestion, then, is that language evolved as a “cheap” form of social grooming, so enabling the ancestral humans to maintain the cohesion of the unusually large groups demanded by the particular conditions they faced at the time.

Having a large network gives rise to a problem know as the Diplomat’s Dilemma: how do I maximize the usefulness of my network whilst minimizing the time I spend grooming it? I don’t know how others do it, but if I had to spend 42% of my time taking care of my social network, I’d never get any work done! In addition, not only the time involved, but also the type of effort involved, may vary greatly within one and the same network.

Snowden also points this out in his blog:

Now the assumption in Dunbar’s working and subsequent writing is that this level of knowledge requires physical proximity. However we now live in virtual as well as physical worlds so the nature of interactions change. The natural limit is probably in place, but its form, and the nature of its creation will have new variants for a new environment.

The cost of maintaining social ties is also analysed in a recent paper by Petter Holme and Gourab Ghoshal entitled “The Diplomat’s Dilemma: Maximizing Power for Minimal Effort in Social Networks”.

So, how do I solve the Diplomat’s Dilemma? Well, I set up a Facebook rule for myself. If I don’t know you well enough to invite you to my house, possibly contributing funding to help cover your travel costs, and am not comfortable with leaving you alone in my house, I won’t link to you on Facebook. I may exchange emails with you, or chat with you on some IM service, or may link to you on one of the professional social networking sites I’m on, but I’m not going to use Facebook for the 147.8 “friends” or acquaintances I have, but rather for the 15 “deep trust” friends (see Snowden’s blog for an explanation of that number).

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

simplicities comprar viagra generico en españa clinic
wood buy viagra online Monday 30th October 2013. Dental Nurse Course Tutors. Matters discussed were the NEBDN Records of Experience which are about to become available online and the NEBDN Online Witness Training Programme which has just gone live. Friday 11th October 2013. Friday 18th - Saturday 19th October. Joan Hatchard and Sophie Schneider attended the annual British Association of Dental Nurses Conference held in the NEC Birmingham. Cresswell KM, Bates DW, Sheikh A. Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technology. Nurmatov UB, Tagiyeva N, Semple S, Devereux G, Sheikh A. Volatile Organic Compounds and risk of asthma and allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and interventional studies. This research presently focuses on muscle tissue and stendra online in future, will be expanded to include other solid organs, applying the principles and knowledge gained from muscle as a solid organ. MEDICAL EDUCATION: In the area of medical education, Nalini is particularly interested in student learning and assessment in the medical sciences. She is currently developing Adaptive eLearning tutorials in Anatomy to be used as a formative assessment tool. Adaptive eLearning tutorials provide a platform for formative assessment of students providing immediate feedback and opportunity to remediate gaps in knowledge. At an educator level, it has the potential to identify areas of troublesome knowledge for a cohort of students, and to evaluate student learning..